

I couldn't get the little picture to disappear.

Now the question I was pondering is this: why is it ok to wear something like this, when you couldn't wear full-length pants of the same design? Picture, if you can (and you probably can't) the model above wearing those same shorts as PANTS. Think about it for a second. Pants with these designs would be RIDICULOUS, and nobody in their right mind would wear them. Am I right? Yes. But if they work as shorts, then why not pants? To me this then begs the question, is it ok to wear pants like this, or should people NOT be wearing shorts like this? Given the answer options, I think everybody would have to agree that people should not be wearing shorts that look like this. I'm not anti plaid shorts, either. Just a curious observer of human behavior.
Some might argue that it is similar with all shorts. I disagree. I have 3 kinds of shorts: jeans, khaki/cargo, and athletic. All have full-length pants that look the same, and all are normal. The one exception could be the athletic shorts, but yes, those also have full-length versions that are normal, and you wear them when you do sporty things (much like the shorts).
So that is what I was pondering. What do all my faithful reader's think?
6 comments:
What! you don't have a pair of pants like that?...you really need to get in touch with your fashionable side. Maybe i can lend you mine...
People do wear pants that look like those. They're called pajamas.
haha i was going to say what Ben said. I love pants of the plaid persuasion... they are a delight. I think they look really classy with matching shirts... and hats.
I know one father who didn't want his boys wearing ANY kind of short pants. Not manly. How can a real man be ready for work when he's dressed in sissy shorts?
Good observations Forrest.
Not sure how I feel about this. I'm going to have to do some serious thinking on this one. I thought I was a fan, but long pants in the same print would look pee-wee herman-ish. Yikes.
Post a Comment